Reading about the Victorians, both in England and New Zealand, you get the impression of a society completely awash on alcohol. Drunkenness was prevalent in both societies; urban working class in England appear to have dealt with the problems of filthy undrinkable water, appalling living conditions and general despair by self-medicating in the extreme. Not that drinking was restricted to the working class – all classes seem to have enjoyed their drink; although drunkenness, as viewed by the early temperance movement, was a problem of the working class.
The settlers in New Zealand weren’t short of booze either. Within a few months of settlement, Wellington had seven pubs on the Thorndon side of the harbour and five on the Petone side. Alcohol formed a substantial portion of the cargo of every arriving vessel. Early cases heard by the Police Magistrate were generally all charges against drunk and disorderly citizens. The binge drinking culture was alive and well in New Zealand from the beginning.
You don’t want to think that your forebears were drunken sots, any more than you want to consider the possibility that they were racists or wife-beaters, but things which might be considered unacceptable now were just a normal part of life back then. Alcohol certainly was – there was a strong do-it-yourself culture of making fruit wines, grogs and punches, and medicine and alcohol were almost indistinguishable from each other. Recipes abounded for home-made beer, mead and wine, and some of the ingredients, not to mention the alcohol content, are downright scary. Fancy some Pepper Punch?
Take 25 small fresh green peppers, 2 ½ pounds of loaf sugar, 10 tablespoons of lime juice and 2 ounces of green ginger. Boil for 10 minutes in 18 pints of water, then add 8 pints of rum. When cold, bottle and cork tightly. Tie down the corks. Keep bottled as long as you like – in ten days it will be up.Rhubarb champagne? Fermented rhubarb stalks, sugar and a little yeast, topped off with a bottle of whisky – yowee! Trouble sleeping? Here’s a nightcap to put you right out – for one serving simmer half a pint of ale, add nutmeg, sugar and brandy, and drink last thing before getting into bed. As for proprietary medicines bought over the counter, they were chock-full of alcohol, or even better, opium derivatives – and used for everything from coughs and colds to digestive problems. Not only that, but they were given freely to babies and children; nobody batted an eyelid about giving a fractious child a wee tot of something to get it to stop crying and go to sleep.
So what about William and Sarah? Drunken sots or abstainers? I’ve got no evidence either way; it’s the absence of evidence that leads me to draw the conclusion that they were probably moderate drinkers. Here’s my reasoning : family oral history would probably have included a mention – things like “your [great-great] grandmother never touched a drop of alcohol in her life” or “William drank all the profits from the business” are the sort of things you would expect to hear if they were either abstainers or heavy drinkers.
I did wonder whether Sarah might have been a non-drinker because she came from a Baptist family. Although later in the nineteenth century the Baptists were heavily involved in the temperance movement, in the early part of the century it was a matter of personal choice. Sarah tells us that her cousin sent a bottle of home-made wine for the wedding breakfast when she and William married, so that suggests that alcohol was drunk in her family, although possibly just for special occasions.
The stricture against drinking during pregnancy is reasonably modern – or at least, the scientific evidence of the damage it can cause the unborn child has only emerged in the last few decades. It certainly wouldn’t have been a consideration in the mid-nineteenth century. Nevertheless, eight of Sarah’s ten children survived childhood, and by all accounts were robustly healthy. There’s no evidence of anything resembling foetal alcohol syndrome, even at the mildest end of the scale. In fact, there’s strong evidence that Oscar and Horace were exceptionally intelligent, so even if Sarah did consume alcohol during pregnancy, it clearly wasn’t to excess.
Then there’s William. It’s always possible that alcohol could have been a reason for his repeated business failures, but it seems unlikely. For one thing, the newspapers of the time didn’t hold back in their reporting – if William had drunk the profits, it would have appeared in the local rag in the guise of sympathy for his wife and family. Not only that, but there would have been a few appearances before the magistrate as drunk and disorderly – these were all faithfully reported by the newspapers of the time, and William’s name never crops up.
On the other hand, William suffered from gout in later life, and good living and alcohol are often contributors to the development of this condition. Photographs of him in old age certainly suggest someone who lived well. However, chronic lead exposure is also a risk factor for gout, and as both a plumber and painter, William’s exposure lead would have been high and ongoing through most of his working life.
Sarah’s father also suffered from gout – in a letter to her in 1875, he advises that he has “found more relief from gin than anything”, but then goes on to say he “used it taking off my shoe and having it on my Stocking 2 or 3 times a Day”, and recommended that William try it!
Probably the single most important determining factor for the Norgroves was money. In the early days (and even later times when things weren’t going well), alcohol would have been an occasional treat – beer or wine on an important social occasion, and a little medicinal brandy in the cupboard. Perhaps even some stout for Sarah when she was breast-feeding, to help build her up. In the 1840s, they might have lived right below the pub, but William wouldn’t have been dropping in every night after work because they simply couldn’t afford it. With greater prosperity would have come greater indulgence – maybe a beer after work, or some sherry in the evening, with wine for special meals.
In terms of writing William and Sarah’s story, a complete absence of alcohol from the story would require explanation, and there isn’t one – there’s no evidence for abstinence. Likewise, heavy alcohol consumption to the point where it affected every day life would tell a completely different story than the one I have here, and again, there’s no evidence for it. A careful balance is required, to show a moderate use of alcohol as appropriate to the family’s changing financial circumstances, without making it seem anything out of the ordinary.